Electrodynamics | Physics - Wyatt's Notes

A changing magnetic field induces an electric field:

$\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}$

Lenz’s Law: The induced EMF opposes the change in flux that produced it.

Example. A circular loop of radius $R$ in a uniform magnetic field $\mathbf{B}(t) = B_0 \cos(\omega t)\,\hat{\mathbf{z}}$.

The flux: $\Phi_B = \pi R^2 B_0 \cos(\omega t)$.

The induced EMF: $\mathcal{E} = -\frac{d\Phi_B}{dt} = \pi R^2 B_0 \omega \sin(\omega t)$.

Maxwell’s key insight: Ampere’s law $\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \mu_0 \mathbf{J}$ is inconsistent with The continuity equation. Adding the displacement current term $\mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \partial \mathbf{E}/\partial t$ Resolves this:

$\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \mu_0 \mathbf{J} + \mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}$

Problem. A parallel-plate capacitor with circular plates of radius $R$ is being charged by a Current $I$. Find the magnetic field between the plates at distance $r$ from the axis.

Solution. Between the plates, $\mathbf{J} = 0$ But there is a changing electric field. The Displacement current density is $J_d = \varepsilon_0 \frac{\partial E}{\partial t}$.

$E = \frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon_0} = \frac{Q}{\pi R^2 \varepsilon_0}$ So $\frac{\partial E}{\partial t} = \frac{I}{\pi R^2 \varepsilon_0}$.

By symmetry, use an Amperian loop of radius $r \lt R$:

$\oint \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{l} = \mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\int \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{A}$

$B \cdot 2\pi r = \mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \cdot \frac{I}{\pi R^2 \varepsilon_0} \cdot \pi r^2 = \frac{\mu_0 I r^2}{R^2}$

$B = \frac{\mu_0 I r}{2\pi R^2}$

$\blacksquare$

When a conductor moves through a magnetic field, the Lorentz force on the charges produces an EMF:

$\mathcal{E} = \oint (\mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B}) \cdot d\mathbf{l}$

This is consistent with the flux rule $\mathcal{E} = -d\Phi_B/dt$ since changing the Circuit’s geometry or position changes the flux.

Problem with Ampere’s original law. The original Ampere’s law was $\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \mu_0 \mathbf{J}$. Taking the divergence:

$\nabla \cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{B}) = 0 = \mu_0 \nabla \cdot \mathbf{J}$

This requires $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J} = 0$ at all times, which contradicts the continuity Equation $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J} = -\partial\rho/\partial t$ whenever charge density changes.

Resolution. Use Gauss’s law to rewrite the continuity equation:

$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J} = -\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t} = -\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(\varepsilon_0 \nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}) = -\nabla \cdot \left(\varepsilon_0\frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}\right)$

$\nabla \cdot \left(\mathbf{J} + \varepsilon_0\frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}\right) = 0$

This suggests modifying Ampere’s law to:

$\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \mu_0 \mathbf{J} + \mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}$

Now taking the divergence gives zero identically, consistent with charge conservation. The Term $\mu_0 \varepsilon_0\,\partial\mathbf{E}/\partial t$ is the displacement current.

Physical interpretation. The displacement current represents the time-varying electric field That produces a magnetic field just as a real current does. It is essential inside capacitors, Where $\mathbf{J} = 0$ but $\partial\mathbf{E}/\partial t \neq 0$.

Mutual inductance. When circuit 1 produces flux $\Phi_{21}$ through circuit 2:

$M = \frac{\Phi_{21}}{I_1}$

The EMF induced in circuit 2 by a changing current in circuit 1:

$\mathcal{E}_2 = -M\frac{dI_1}{dt}$

Self-inductance. A circuit carrying current $I$ produces flux $\Phi$ through itself:

$L = \frac{N\Phi}{I}$

The back-EMF:

$\mathcal{E} = -L\frac{dI}{dt}$

Energy stored in an inductor:

$U = \frac{1}{2}LI^2$

Example: Solenoid. A long solenoid of length $\ell$ with $N$ turns, cross-sectional area $A$:

$L = \frac{\mu_0 N^2 A}{\ell}$

flowchart TD
    A[4_Electrodynamics] --> B[Key Concepts]
    A --> C[Core Principles]
    A --> D[Practical Applications]
    B --> E[Fundamental definitions]
    C --> F[Design patterns]
    D --> G[Real-world usage]

Electrodynamics is the physics of how changing fields create each other. Faraday’s law says a changing magnetic field whips up an electric field like stirring tea creates a whirlpool. The displacement current is Maxwell’s brilliant addition: a changing electric field produces a magnetic field just as a real current does, which is what allows electromagnetic waves to propagate through empty space. Lenz’s law is nature’s stubbornness: when you try to change the magnetic flux through a loop, the loop fights back by inducing a current that opposes the change. This is why a magnet falling through a copper pipe slows down even though copper is not magnetic. Self-inductance is like electrical inertia: an inductor resists changes in current the way a massive object resists changes in velocity. The energy stored in an inductor’s magnetic field is like the kinetic energy of a moving mass.

Mistake 1: Forgetting the minus sign in Faraday’s law The induced EMF is $\mathcal{E} = -d\Phi_B/dt$, not $+d\Phi_B/dt$. The minus sign encodes Lenz’s law: the induced current opposes the change in flux that produced it. Dropping the sign leads to predictions of perpetual motion machines where induced currents accelerate rather than resist motion.

Mistake 2: Treating displacement current as actual charge flow The displacement current $\mu_0\varepsilon_0\,\partial\mathbf{E}/\partial t$ is not a real current carried by moving charges. It is a term in Maxwell’s equations that accounts for the magnetic field produced by a time-varying electric field. Inside a charging capacitor, $\mathbf{J} = 0$ but $\partial\mathbf{E}/\partial t \neq 0$, so the displacement current fills the gap.

Mistake 3: Applying Faraday’s law to non-conservative fields Faraday’s law $\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\partial\mathbf{B}/\partial t$ applies to induced electric fields, which are non-conservative. Students sometimes attempt to define a scalar potential for these fields, but $\mathbf{E} \neq -\nabla V$ when $\partial\mathbf{B}/\partial t \neq 0$. The scalar potential formulation only works in the static limit.

• Maxwell’s Equations: Faraday’s law and the displacement current are two of Maxwell’s four equations that govern electrodynamics.

• Magnetostatics: Magnetostatics is the static limit where time derivatives vanish, describing steady currents without induction.

• The Wave Equation: The wave equation for electromagnetic fields follows from Maxwell’s equations and describes light propagation.

• Calculus

• Linear Algebra

• Vector Calculus

This section provides detailed coverage of advanced concepts, including full derivations, proofs, and extended examples.

Complete mathematical derivations and proofs are provided where appropriate. Each step is explained to ensure understanding of the underlying reasoning.

Advanced examples demonstrate the application of concepts to complex problems. These examples go beyond standard exam questions to develop deeper understanding.

This material connects to current research and advanced applications in the field. Understanding these connections provides context for the study material.

Ensure you have mastered the prerequisite material before attempting this advanced content.