From Maxwell’s equations, the following properties hold for plane EM waves:
Transversality: E \mathbf{E} E and B \mathbf{B} B are perpendicular to k \mathbf{k} k and to each other.Orthogonality: E ⊥ B \mathbf{E} \perp \mathbf{B} E ⊥ B And ∣ E ∣ = c ∣ B ∣ |\mathbf{E}| = c|\mathbf{B}| ∣ E ∣ = c ∣ B ∣ .In-phase: E \mathbf{E} E and B \mathbf{B} B oscillate in phase.Dispersion relation: ω = c k \omega = ck ω = c k in vacuum.Proof of transversality. For a plane wave E = E 0 e i ( k ⋅ r − ω t ) \mathbf{E} = \mathbf{E}_0 e^{i(\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r} - \omega t)} E = E 0 e i ( k ⋅ r − ω t ) Gauss’s law gives i k ⋅ E 0 = 0 i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{E}_0 = 0 i k ⋅ E 0 = 0 So k ⊥ E 0 \mathbf{k} \perp \mathbf{E}_0 k ⊥ E 0 . Similarly From ∇ ⋅ B = 0 \nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0 ∇ ⋅ B = 0 : k ⊥ B 0 \mathbf{k} \perp \mathbf{B}_0 k ⊥ B 0 . ■ \blacksquare ■
Proof of ∣ E ∣ = c ∣ B ∣ |\mathbf{E}| = c|\mathbf{B}| ∣ E ∣ = c ∣ B ∣ . From Faraday’s law for a plane wave: k × E 0 = ω B 0 \mathbf{k} \times \mathbf{E}_0 = \omega\mathbf{B}_0 k × E 0 = ω B 0 . Taking magnitudes: k E 0 = ω B 0 kE_0 = \omega B_0 k E 0 = ω B 0 So E 0 / B 0 = ω / k = c E_0/B_0 = \omega/k = c E 0 / B 0 = ω / k = c . ■ \blacksquare ■
Worked Example: Plane wave fields and intensity Problem. A plane wave in vacuum has E = ( 20 x ^ + 30 y ^ ) cos ( k z − ω t ) \mathbf{E} = (20\hat{\mathbf{x}} + 30\hat{\mathbf{y}})\cos(kz - \omega t) E = ( 20 x ^ + 30 y ^ ) cos ( k z − ω t ) V/m with λ = 500 \lambda = 500 λ = 500 nm. Find B \mathbf{B} B The intensity, and describe the polarisation state.
Solution. ∣ E 0 ∣ = 20 2 + 30 2 = 1300 ≈ 36.1 |\mathbf{E}_0| = \sqrt{20^2 + 30^2} = \sqrt{1300} \approx 36.1 ∣ E 0 ∣ = 2 0 2 + 3 0 2 = 1300 ≈ 36.1 V/m. B 0 = E 0 / c = 36.1 / ( 3 × 10 8 ) = 1.20 × 10 − 7 B_0 = E_0/c = 36.1/(3 \times 10^8) = 1.20 \times 10^{-7} B 0 = E 0 / c = 36.1/ ( 3 × 1 0 8 ) = 1.20 × 1 0 − 7 T.
Since k = k z ^ \mathbf{k} = k\hat{\mathbf{z}} k = k z ^ and B 0 = k ^ × E 0 / c \mathbf{B}_0 = \hat{\mathbf{k}} \times \mathbf{E}_0/c B 0 = k ^ × E 0 / c : B = ( − 20 y ^ + 30 x ^ ) B 0 / E 0 ⋅ cos ( k z − ω t ) / c \mathbf{B} = (-20\hat{\mathbf{y}} + 30\hat{\mathbf{x}})B_0/E_0 \cdot \cos(kz - \omega t)/c B = ( − 20 y ^ + 30 x ^ ) B 0 / E 0 ⋅ cos ( k z − ω t ) / c = ( 30 x ^ − 20 y ^ ) ( 1 / c ) cos ( k z − ω t ) = (30\hat{\mathbf{x}} - 20\hat{\mathbf{y}})(1/c)\cos(kz - \omega t) = ( 30 x ^ − 20 y ^ ) ( 1/ c ) cos ( k z − ω t ) T.
Intensity: I = 1 2 c ε 0 E 0 2 = 1 2 ( 3 × 10 8 ) ( 8.854 × 10 − 12 ) ( 1300 ) = 1.73 I = \frac{1}{2}c\varepsilon_0 E_0^2 = \frac{1}{2}(3 \times 10^8)(8.854 \times 10^{-12})(1300) = 1.73 I = 2 1 c ε 0 E 0 2 = 2 1 ( 3 × 1 0 8 ) ( 8.854 × 1 0 − 12 ) ( 1300 ) = 1.73 W/m2 ^2 2 .
Polarisation: E 0 \mathbf{E}_0 E 0 has components along x ^ \hat{\mathbf{x}} x ^ and y ^ \hat{\mathbf{y}} y ^ with a Constant phase relationship (δ = 0 \delta = 0 δ = 0 ), so the wave is linearly polarised at angle θ = arctan ( 30 / 20 ) = 56.3 ° \theta = \arctan(30/20) = 56.3° θ = arctan ( 30/20 ) = 56.3° from the x x x -axis.
The Poynting vector :
S = 1 μ 0 E × B \mathbf{S} = \frac{1}{\mu_0}\mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{B} S = μ 0 1 E × B
Represents the energy flux (W/m2 ^2 2 ). The time-averaged intensity for a plane wave:
I = ⟨ S ⟩ = 1 2 c ε 0 E 0 2 I = \langle S \rangle = \frac{1}{2}c\varepsilon_0 E_0^2 I = ⟨ S ⟩ = 2 1 c ε 0 E 0 2
The energy density of an EM field is:
u = 1 2 ε 0 E 2 + 1 2 μ 0 B 2 = ε 0 E 2 u = \frac{1}{2}\varepsilon_0 E^2 + \frac{1}{2\mu_0}B^2 = \varepsilon_0 E^2 u = 2 1 ε 0 E 2 + 2 μ 0 1 B 2 = ε 0 E 2
(the electric and magnetic contributions are equal for a plane wave). The intensity is related to The energy density by I = u c I = uc I = u c .
Radiation pressure. For a perfectly absorbing surface: P r a d = I / c P_{\mathrm{rad} = I/c} P rad = I / c . For a perfectly Reflecting surface: P r a d = 2 I / c P_{\mathrm{rad} = 2I/c} P rad = 2 I / c .
Worked Example: Radiation pressure from a laser Problem. A 5 mW laser beam (λ = 632.8 \lambda = 632.8 λ = 632.8 nm) is normally incident on a perfectly reflecting Mirror. The beam has a diameter of 1 mm. Find the radiation pressure and the force on the mirror.
Solution. Beam area: A = π ( 0.5 × 10 − 3 ) 2 = 7.85 × 10 − 7 A = \pi(0.5 \times 10^{-3})^2 = 7.85 \times 10^{-7} A = π ( 0.5 × 1 0 − 3 ) 2 = 7.85 × 1 0 − 7 m2 ^2 2 . Intensity: I = P / A = 5 × 10 − 3 / ( 7.85 × 10 − 7 ) = 6.37 × 10 3 I = P/A = 5 \times 10^{-3}/(7.85 \times 10^{-7}) = 6.37 \times 10^3 I = P / A = 5 × 1 0 − 3 / ( 7.85 × 1 0 − 7 ) = 6.37 × 1 0 3 W/m2 ^2 2 .
Radiation pressure (reflecting): P r a d = 2 I / c = 2 ( 6.37 × 10 3 ) / ( 3 × 10 8 ) = 4.25 × 10 − 5 P_{\mathrm{rad} = 2I/c = 2(6.37 \times 10^3)/(3 \times 10^8) = 4.25 \times 10^{-5}} P rad = 2 I / c = 2 ( 6.37 × 1 0 3 ) / ( 3 × 1 0 8 ) = 4.25 × 1 0 − 5 Pa.
Force: F = P r a d ⋅ A = ( 4.25 × 10 − 5 ) ( 7.85 × 10 − 7 ) = 3.34 × 10 − 11 F = P_{\mathrm{rad} \cdot A = (4.25 \times 10^{-5})(7.85 \times 10^{-7}) = 3.34 \times 10^{-11}} F = P rad ⋅ A = ( 4.25 × 1 0 − 5 ) ( 7.85 × 1 0 − 7 ) = 3.34 × 1 0 − 11 N.
In a linear, isotropic, non-magnetic medium with refractive index n n n :
v = c n , k = n ω c k ^ v = \frac{c}{n}, \quad \mathbf{k} = n\frac{\omega}{c}\hat{\mathbf{k}} v = n c , k = n c ω k ^
The index of refraction is related to the relative permittivity and permeability:
n = ε r μ r n = \sqrt{\varepsilon_r \mu_r} n = ε r μ r
For non-magnetic materials (μ r ≈ 1 \mu_r \approx 1 μ r ≈ 1 ): n ≈ ε r n \approx \sqrt{\varepsilon_r} n ≈ ε r .
The wavelength inside a medium of refractive index n n n is λ n = λ 0 / n \lambda_n = \lambda_0/n λ n = λ 0 / n Where λ 0 \lambda_0 λ 0 Is the vacuum wavelength. The frequency remains unchanged across the boundary.
Worked Example: EM wave propagation in glass Problem. A plane wave of wavelength λ 0 = 600 \lambda_0 = 600 λ 0 = 600 nm in vacuum enters a glass slab (n = 1.50 n = 1.50 n = 1.50 ) at normal incidence. Find (a) the wavelength and wave speed inside the glass, (b) the Frequency, and (c) the ratio of intensities inside and outside the glass, accounting for reflection At the front surface.
Solution.
(a) λ n = λ 0 / n = 600 / 1.50 = 400 \lambda_n = \lambda_0/n = 600/1.50 = 400 λ n = λ 0 / n = 600/1.50 = 400 nm. v = c / n = 2.0 × 10 8 v = c/n = 2.0 \times 10^8 v = c / n = 2.0 × 1 0 8 m/s.
(b) f = c / λ 0 = ( 3 × 10 8 ) / ( 600 × 10 − 9 ) = 5.0 × 10 14 f = c/\lambda_0 = (3 \times 10^8)/(600 \times 10^{-9}) = 5.0 \times 10^{14} f = c / λ 0 = ( 3 × 1 0 8 ) / ( 600 × 1 0 − 9 ) = 5.0 × 1 0 14 Hz (unchanged).
(c) At normal incidence: R = [ ( n 1 − n 2 ) / ( n 1 + n 2 ) ] 2 = [ ( 1 − 1.5 ) / ( 1 + 1.5 ) ] 2 = ( 0.5 / 2.5 ) 2 = 0.04 R = [(n_1 - n_2)/(n_1 + n_2)]^2 = [(1 - 1.5)/(1 + 1.5)]^2 = (0.5/2.5)^2 = 0.04 R = [( n 1 − n 2 ) / ( n 1 + n 2 ) ] 2 = [( 1 − 1.5 ) / ( 1 + 1.5 ) ] 2 = ( 0.5/2.5 ) 2 = 0.04 . Transmittance: T = 1 − R = 0.96 T = 1 - R = 0.96 T = 1 − R = 0.96 . The intensity inside the glass is I i n s i d e = 0.96 I 0 I_{\mathrm{inside} = 0.96\,I_0} I inside = 0.96 I 0 But the power per unit area Referenced to the vacuum intensity is I i n s i d e = ( n 2 / n 1 ) T I 0 = 1.5 × 0.96 × I 0 = 1.44 I 0 I_{\mathrm{inside} = (n_2/n_1)\,T\,I_0 = 1.5 \times 0.96 \times I_0 = 1.44\,I_0} I inside = ( n 2 / n 1 ) T I 0 = 1.5 × 0.96 × I 0 = 1.44 I 0 If we compare the electric field amplitudes squared times the respective impedances.
At a planar interface between two linear, isotropic media, the tangential components of E \mathbf{E} E and H \mathbf{H} H and the normal components of D \mathbf{D} D and B \mathbf{B} B are Continuous across the boundary.
Consider a plane wave incident from medium 1 (n 1 n_1 n 1 ) onto medium 2 (n 2 n_2 n 2 ), with the interface at z = 0 z = 0 z = 0 and the plane of incidence the x z xz x z -plane.
The phase matching condition requires the phases of all three waves (incident, reflected, Transmitted) to match at z = 0 z = 0 z = 0 for all x x x and t t t . This gives:
k 1 sin θ i = k 1 sin θ r = k 2 sin θ t k_1\sin\theta_i = k_1\sin\theta_r = k_2\sin\theta_t k 1 sin θ i = k 1 sin θ r = k 2 sin θ t
From the first equality: θ i = θ r \theta_i = \theta_r θ i = θ r (law of reflection ). From the second equality: n 1 sin θ i = n 2 sin θ t n_1\sin\theta_i = n_2\sin\theta_t n 1 sin θ i = n 2 sin θ t (Snell’s law ).
Proof. The incident, reflected, and transmitted fields are:
E i ∝ e i ( k 1 x x + k 1 z z − ω t ) , E r ∝ e i ( k 1 x ′ x + k 1 z ′ z − ω t ) , E t ∝ e i ( k 2 x x + k 2 z z − ω t ) E_i \propto e^{i(k_{1x}x + k_{1z}z - \omega t)}, \quad E_r \propto e^{i(k_{1x}'x + k_{1z}'z - \omega t)}, \quad E_t \propto e^{i(k_{2x}x + k_{2z}z - \omega t)} E i ∝ e i ( k 1 x x + k 1 z z − ω t ) , E r ∝ e i ( k 1 x ′ x + k 1 z ′ z − ω t ) , E t ∝ e i ( k 2 x x + k 2 z z − ω t )
At z = 0 z = 0 z = 0 The tangential field must be continuous for all x x x and t t t : k 1 x = k 1 x ′ = k 2 x k_{1x} = k_{1x}' = k_{2x} k 1 x = k 1 x ′ = k 2 x I.e., k 1 sin θ i = k 1 sin θ r = k 2 sin θ t k_1\sin\theta_i = k_1\sin\theta_r = k_2\sin\theta_t k 1 sin θ i = k 1 sin θ r = k 2 sin θ t . Since k = n ω / c k = n\omega/c k = nω / c This yields Snell’s law. ■ \blacksquare ■
Applying the boundary conditions for the tangential fields yields the Fresnel equations for the Amplitude reflection and transmission coefficients.
s-polarisation (E \mathbf{E} E perpendicular to the plane of incidence, along y ^ \hat{\mathbf{y}} y ^ ): The tangential components of E \mathbf{E} E and H \mathbf{H} H give:
r s = E 0 r E 0 i = n 1 cos θ i − n 2 cos θ t n 1 cos θ i + n 2 cos θ t r_s = \frac{E_{0r}}{E_{0i}} = \frac{n_1\cos\theta_i - n_2\cos\theta_t}{n_1\cos\theta_i + n_2\cos\theta_t} r s = E 0 i E 0 r = n 1 c o s θ i + n 2 c o s θ t n 1 c o s θ i − n 2 c o s θ t
t s = E 0 t E 0 i = 2 n 1 cos θ i n 1 cos θ i + n 2 cos θ t t_s = \frac{E_{0t}}{E_{0i}} = \frac{2n_1\cos\theta_i}{n_1\cos\theta_i + n_2\cos\theta_t} t s = E 0 i E 0 t = n 1 c o s θ i + n 2 c o s θ t 2 n 1 c o s θ i
p-polarisation (E \mathbf{E} E parallel to the plane of incidence): The tangential components of E \mathbf{E} E and H \mathbf{H} H give:
r p = E 0 r E 0 i = n 2 cos θ i − n 1 cos θ t n 2 cos θ i + n 1 cos θ t r_p = \frac{E_{0r}}{E_{0i}} = \frac{n_2\cos\theta_i - n_1\cos\theta_t}{n_2\cos\theta_i + n_1\cos\theta_t} r p = E 0 i E 0 r = n 2 c o s θ i + n 1 c o s θ t n 2 c o s θ i − n 1 c o s θ t
t p = E 0 t E 0 i = 2 n 1 cos θ i n 2 cos θ i + n 1 cos θ t t_p = \frac{E_{0t}}{E_{0i}} = \frac{2n_1\cos\theta_i}{n_2\cos\theta_i + n_1\cos\theta_t} t p = E 0 i E 0 t = n 2 c o s θ i + n 1 c o s θ t 2 n 1 c o s θ i
Reflectance and transmittance (energy fractions):
R s = ∣ r s ∣ 2 , T s = n 2 cos θ t n 1 cos θ i ∣ t s ∣ 2 , R s + T s = 1 R_s = |r_s|^2, \quad T_s = \frac{n_2\cos\theta_t}{n_1\cos\theta_i}|t_s|^2, \quad R_s + T_s = 1 R s = ∣ r s ∣ 2 , T s = n 1 c o s θ i n 2 c o s θ t ∣ t s ∣ 2 , R s + T s = 1
R p = ∣ r p ∣ 2 , T p = n 2 cos θ t n 1 cos θ i ∣ t p ∣ 2 , R p + T p = 1 R_p = |r_p|^2, \quad T_p = \frac{n_2\cos\theta_t}{n_1\cos\theta_i}|t_p|^2, \quad R_p + T_p = 1 R p = ∣ r p ∣ 2 , T p = n 1 c o s θ i n 2 c o s θ t ∣ t p ∣ 2 , R p + T p = 1
At normal incidence (θ i = 0 \theta_i = 0 θ i = 0 ): r s = r p = ( n 1 − n 2 ) / ( n 1 + n 2 ) r_s = r_p = (n_1 - n_2)/(n_1 + n_2) r s = r p = ( n 1 − n 2 ) / ( n 1 + n 2 ) and R = [ ( n 1 − n 2 ) / ( n 1 + n 2 ) ] 2 R = [(n_1 - n_2)/(n_1 + n_2)]^2 R = [( n 1 − n 2 ) / ( n 1 + n 2 ) ] 2 .
Worked Example: Fresnel coefficients at a glass-air interface Problem. Light is incident from air (n 1 = 1.00 n_1 = 1.00 n 1 = 1.00 ) onto glass (n 2 = 1.50 n_2 = 1.50 n 2 = 1.50 ) at θ i = 30 ° \theta_i = 30° θ i = 30° . Calculate r s r_s r s , r p r_p r p , R s R_s R s And R p R_p R p .
Solution. From Snell’s law: sin θ t = sin 30 ° / 1.50 = 0.333 \sin\theta_t = \sin 30°/1.50 = 0.333 sin θ t = sin 30°/1.50 = 0.333 So θ t = 19.47 ° \theta_t = 19.47° θ t = 19.47° . cos θ i = cos 30 ° = 0.866 \cos\theta_i = \cos 30° = 0.866 cos θ i = cos 30° = 0.866 , cos θ t = cos 19.47 ° = 0.943 \cos\theta_t = \cos 19.47° = 0.943 cos θ t = cos 19.47° = 0.943 .
r s = 1.00 × 0.866 − 1.50 × 0.943 1.00 × 0.866 + 1.50 × 0.943 = 0.866 − 1.414 0.866 + 1.414 = − 0.549 2.280 = − 0.241 r_s = \frac{1.00 \times 0.866 - 1.50 \times 0.943}{1.00 \times 0.866 + 1.50 \times 0.943} = \frac{0.866 - 1.414}{0.866 + 1.414} = \frac{-0.549}{2.280} = -0.241 r s = 1.00 × 0.866 + 1.50 × 0.943 1.00 × 0.866 − 1.50 × 0.943 = 0.866 + 1.414 0.866 − 1.414 = 2.280 − 0.549 = − 0.241
R s = r s 2 = 0.0580 R_s = r_s^2 = 0.0580 R s = r s 2 = 0.0580
r p = 1.50 × 0.866 − 1.00 × 0.943 1.50 × 0.866 + 1.00 × 0.943 = 1.299 − 0.943 1.299 + 0.943 = 0.356 2.242 = 0.159 r_p = \frac{1.50 \times 0.866 - 1.00 \times 0.943}{1.50 \times 0.866 + 1.00 \times 0.943} = \frac{1.299 - 0.943}{1.299 + 0.943} = \frac{0.356}{2.242} = 0.159 r p = 1.50 × 0.866 + 1.00 × 0.943 1.50 × 0.866 − 1.00 × 0.943 = 1.299 + 0.943 1.299 − 0.943 = 2.242 0.356 = 0.159
R p = r p 2 = 0.0252 R_p = r_p^2 = 0.0252 R p = r p 2 = 0.0252
At this angle, p-polarised light is reflected less efficiently than s-polarised light. The Negative sign of r s r_s r s indicates a phase shift of π \pi π upon reflection.
Caution
error is to swap the n 1 cos θ i n_1\cos\theta_i n 1 cos θ i and n 2 cos θ t n_2\cos\theta_t n 2 cos θ t terms. Remember: for r s r_s r s The numerator starts with n 1 cos θ i n_1\cos\theta_i n 1 cos θ i ; for r p r_p r p The numerator starts with n 2 cos θ i n_2\cos\theta_i n 2 cos θ i . Also, r r r and t t t are Amplitude coefficients, while R R R and T T T are energy coefficients — they are related but not Interchangeable.
When light travels from a denser to a rarer medium (n 1 > n 2 n_1 \gt n_2 n 1 > n 2 ) and the angle of incidence Exceeds the critical angle :
θ c = arcsin ( n 2 n 1 ) \theta_c = \arcsin\!\left(\frac{n_2}{n_1}\right) θ c = arcsin ( n 1 n 2 )
Snell’s law gives sin θ t = ( n 1 / n 2 ) sin θ i > 1 \sin\theta_t = (n_1/n_2)\sin\theta_i \gt 1 sin θ t = ( n 1 / n 2 ) sin θ i > 1 So θ t \theta_t θ t becomes complex. Writing cos θ t = i sin 2 θ t − 1 \cos\theta_t = i\sqrt{\sin^2\theta_t - 1} cos θ t = i sin 2 θ t − 1 The Fresnel coefficients become complex with ∣ r s ∣ 2 = ∣ r p ∣ 2 = 1 |r_s|^2 = |r_p|^2 = 1 ∣ r s ∣ 2 = ∣ r p ∣ 2 = 1 : all energy is reflected.
The transmitted field becomes an evanescent wave :
E t ∝ e − κ z e i ( k x x − ω t ) E_t \propto e^{-\kappa z}\, e^{i(k_x x - \omega t)} E t ∝ e − κ z e i ( k x x − ω t )
Where:
κ = k 0 n 1 2 sin 2 θ i − n 2 2 , k x = k 0 n 1 sin θ i \kappa = k_0\sqrt{n_1^2\sin^2\theta_i - n_2^2}, \quad k_x = k_0 n_1\sin\theta_i κ = k 0 n 1 2 sin 2 θ i − n 2 2 , k x = k 0 n 1 sin θ i
The field decays exponentially with penetration depth δ = 1 / κ \delta = 1/\kappa δ = 1/ κ into the second medium, But propagates without loss along the interface. No net energy is transported across the boundary (T = 0 T = 0 T = 0 ).
Frustrated total internal reflection (FTIR). If a third medium (with n 3 ≥ n 2 n_3 \geq n_2 n 3 ≥ n 2 ) is brought Within a distance comparable to δ \delta δ of the interface, the evanescent wave can couple into it, Allowing energy transmission across the gap. This is the optical analogue of quantum mechanical Tunnelling.
Worked Example: Critical angle and evanescent wave penetration Problem. Light travels from glass (n 1 = 1.50 n_1 = 1.50 n 1 = 1.50 ) to air (n 2 = 1.00 n_2 = 1.00 n 2 = 1.00 ) at θ i = 50 ° \theta_i = 50° θ i = 50° . Find (a) the critical angle, (b) the penetration depth for λ = 500 \lambda = 500 λ = 500 nm, and (c) the Propagation constant along the interface.
Solution.
(a) θ c = arcsin ( n 2 / n 1 ) = arcsin ( 1 / 1.50 ) = 41.8 ° \theta_c = \arcsin(n_2/n_1) = \arcsin(1/1.50) = 41.8° θ c = arcsin ( n 2 / n 1 ) = arcsin ( 1/1.50 ) = 41.8° . Since 50 ° > 41.8 ° 50° \gt 41.8° 50° > 41.8° TIR occurs.
(b) κ = k 0 n 1 2 sin 2 θ i − n 2 2 \kappa = k_0\sqrt{n_1^2\sin^2\theta_i - n_2^2} κ = k 0 n 1 2 sin 2 θ i − n 2 2 = 2 π λ ( 1.50 ) 2 sin 2 50 ° − 1.00 2 = \frac{2\pi}{\lambda}\sqrt{(1.50)^2\sin^2 50° - 1.00^2} = λ 2 π ( 1.50 ) 2 sin 2 50° − 1.0 0 2 = 2 π 500 × 10 − 9 2.25 × 0.587 − 1.00 = \frac{2\pi}{500 \times 10^{-9}}\sqrt{2.25 \times 0.587 - 1.00} = 500 × 1 0 − 9 2 π 2.25 × 0.587 − 1.00 = ( 1.257 × 10 7 ) 0.320 = (1.257 \times 10^7)\sqrt{0.320} = ( 1.257 × 1 0 7 ) 0.320 = ( 1.257 × 10 7 ) ( 0.566 ) = 7.11 × 10 6 = (1.257 \times 10^7)(0.566) = 7.11 \times 10^6 = ( 1.257 × 1 0 7 ) ( 0.566 ) = 7.11 × 1 0 6 m− 1 ^{-1} − 1
Penetration depth: δ = 1 / κ = 1.41 × 10 − 7 \delta = 1/\kappa = 1.41 \times 10^{-7} δ = 1/ κ = 1.41 × 1 0 − 7 m = 141 = 141 = 141 nm.
(c) k x = k 0 n 1 sin θ i = ( 2 π / ( 500 × 10 − 9 ) ) ( 1.50 ) ( 0.766 ) = 1.44 × 10 7 k_x = k_0 n_1\sin\theta_i = (2\pi/(500 \times 10^{-9}))(1.50)(0.766) = 1.44 \times 10^7 k x = k 0 n 1 sin θ i = ( 2 π / ( 500 × 1 0 − 9 )) ( 1.50 ) ( 0.766 ) = 1.44 × 1 0 7 m− 1 ^{-1} − 1 .
A[2_Electromagnetic Waves] --> B[Key Concepts]
A --> D[Practical Applications]
B --> E[Fundamental definitions]
D --> G[Real-world usage]
Total internal reflection occurs when light tries to pass from a denser medium to a less dense medium at too steep an angle. Instead of refracting, the light bounces back completely, with an evanescent wave that decays exponentially into the less dense medium. This evanescent field is real but carries no net energy away from the interface. The critical angle depends only on the ratio of refractive indices. This principle underpins fiber optic communication, where light is trapped inside a glass core by repeated total internal reflections, traveling long distances with minimal loss. The penetration depth of the evanescent wave can be tuned by changing the angle of incidence.
Mistake 1: Forgetting that frequency is conserved when light crosses a boundary When light passes from one medium to another, the frequency remains constant while the wavelength and speed change. Students often mistakenly assume the wavelength is conserved, leading to incorrect calculations of refraction. The correct approach is v = c / n v = c/n v = c / n , λ n = λ 0 / n \lambda_n = \lambda_0/n λ n = λ 0 / n , with f = c / λ 0 f = c/\lambda_0 f = c / λ 0 unchanged across the boundary.
Mistake 2: Confusing amplitude coefficients with energy coefficients in Fresnel equations The Fresnel coefficients r r r and t t t are amplitude ratios, while R = ∣ r ∣ 2 R = |r|^2 R = ∣ r ∣ 2 and T = ( n 2 cos θ t / n 1 cos θ i ) ∣ t ∣ 2 T = (n_2\cos\theta_t/n_1\cos\theta_i)|t|^2 T = ( n 2 cos θ t / n 1 cos θ i ) ∣ t ∣ 2 are energy fractions. Students frequently use R = r 2 R = r^2 R = r 2 instead of R = ∣ r ∣ 2 R = |r|^2 R = ∣ r ∣ 2 (which matters when r r r is negative, indicating a phase shift) and forget the cos factor in the transmittance formula.
Mistake 3: Assuming ∣ E ∣ = c ∣ B ∣ |\mathbf{E}| = c|\mathbf{B}| ∣ E ∣ = c ∣ B ∣ implies E \mathbf{E} E and B \mathbf{B} B have the same units The relation E = c B E = cB E = c B is in SI units, where E E E is in V/m and B B B is in tesla. The numerical values differ by a factor of c ≈ 3 × 10 8 c \approx 3 \times 10^8 c ≈ 3 × 1 0 8 . In Gaussian units, E = B E = B E = B numerically. Students sometimes forget this distinction when comparing results from different unit systems.