Skip to content

Electromagnetic Waves | Physics

From Maxwell’s equations, the following properties hold for plane EM waves:

  1. Transversality: E\mathbf{E} and B\mathbf{B} are perpendicular to k\mathbf{k} and to each other.
  2. Orthogonality: EB\mathbf{E} \perp \mathbf{B} And E=cB|\mathbf{E}| = c|\mathbf{B}|.
  3. In-phase: E\mathbf{E} and B\mathbf{B} oscillate in phase.
  4. Dispersion relation: ω=ck\omega = ck in vacuum.

Proof of transversality. For a plane wave E=E0ei(krωt)\mathbf{E} = \mathbf{E}_0 e^{i(\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r} - \omega t)} Gauss’s law gives ikE0=0i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{E}_0 = 0 So kE0\mathbf{k} \perp \mathbf{E}_0. Similarly From B=0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0: kB0\mathbf{k} \perp \mathbf{B}_0. \blacksquare

Proof of E=cB|\mathbf{E}| = c|\mathbf{B}|. From Faraday’s law for a plane wave: k×E0=ωB0\mathbf{k} \times \mathbf{E}_0 = \omega\mathbf{B}_0. Taking magnitudes: kE0=ωB0kE_0 = \omega B_0 So E0/B0=ω/k=cE_0/B_0 = \omega/k = c. \blacksquare

Worked Example: Plane wave fields and intensity

Problem. A plane wave in vacuum has E=(20x^+30y^)cos(kzωt)\mathbf{E} = (20\hat{\mathbf{x}} + 30\hat{\mathbf{y}})\cos(kz - \omega t) V/m with λ=500\lambda = 500 nm. Find B\mathbf{B}The intensity, and describe the polarisation state.

Solution. E0=202+302=130036.1|\mathbf{E}_0| = \sqrt{20^2 + 30^2} = \sqrt{1300} \approx 36.1 V/m. B0=E0/c=36.1/(3×108)=1.20×107B_0 = E_0/c = 36.1/(3 \times 10^8) = 1.20 \times 10^{-7} T.

Since k=kz^\mathbf{k} = k\hat{\mathbf{z}} and B0=k^×E0/c\mathbf{B}_0 = \hat{\mathbf{k}} \times \mathbf{E}_0/c: B=(20y^+30x^)B0/E0cos(kzωt)/c\mathbf{B} = (-20\hat{\mathbf{y}} + 30\hat{\mathbf{x}})B_0/E_0 \cdot \cos(kz - \omega t)/c =(30x^20y^)(1/c)cos(kzωt)= (30\hat{\mathbf{x}} - 20\hat{\mathbf{y}})(1/c)\cos(kz - \omega t) T.

Intensity: I=12cε0E02=12(3×108)(8.854×1012)(1300)=1.73I = \frac{1}{2}c\varepsilon_0 E_0^2 = \frac{1}{2}(3 \times 10^8)(8.854 \times 10^{-12})(1300) = 1.73 W/m2^2.

Polarisation: E0\mathbf{E}_0 has components along x^\hat{\mathbf{x}} and y^\hat{\mathbf{y}} with a Constant phase relationship (δ=0\delta = 0), so the wave is linearly polarised at angle θ=arctan(30/20)=56.3°\theta = \arctan(30/20) = 56.3° from the xx-axis.

The Poynting vector:

S=1μ0E×B\mathbf{S} = \frac{1}{\mu_0}\mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{B}

Represents the energy flux (W/m2^2). The time-averaged intensity for a plane wave:

I=S=12cε0E02I = \langle S \rangle = \frac{1}{2}c\varepsilon_0 E_0^2

The energy density of an EM field is:

u=12ε0E2+12μ0B2=ε0E2u = \frac{1}{2}\varepsilon_0 E^2 + \frac{1}{2\mu_0}B^2 = \varepsilon_0 E^2

(the electric and magnetic contributions are equal for a plane wave). The intensity is related to The energy density by I=ucI = uc.

Radiation pressure. For a perfectly absorbing surface: Prad=I/cP_{\mathrm{rad} = I/c}. For a perfectly Reflecting surface: Prad=2I/cP_{\mathrm{rad} = 2I/c}.

Worked Example: Radiation pressure from a laser

Problem. A 5 mW laser beam (λ=632.8\lambda = 632.8 nm) is normally incident on a perfectly reflecting Mirror. The beam has a diameter of 1 mm. Find the radiation pressure and the force on the mirror.

Solution. Beam area: A=π(0.5×103)2=7.85×107A = \pi(0.5 \times 10^{-3})^2 = 7.85 \times 10^{-7} m2^2. Intensity: I=P/A=5×103/(7.85×107)=6.37×103I = P/A = 5 \times 10^{-3}/(7.85 \times 10^{-7}) = 6.37 \times 10^3 W/m2^2.

Radiation pressure (reflecting): Prad=2I/c=2(6.37×103)/(3×108)=4.25×105P_{\mathrm{rad} = 2I/c = 2(6.37 \times 10^3)/(3 \times 10^8) = 4.25 \times 10^{-5}} Pa.

Force: F=PradA=(4.25×105)(7.85×107)=3.34×1011F = P_{\mathrm{rad} \cdot A = (4.25 \times 10^{-5})(7.85 \times 10^{-7}) = 3.34 \times 10^{-11}} N.

In a linear, isotropic, non-magnetic medium with refractive index nn:

v=cn,k=nωck^v = \frac{c}{n}, \quad \mathbf{k} = n\frac{\omega}{c}\hat{\mathbf{k}}

The index of refraction is related to the relative permittivity and permeability:

n=εrμrn = \sqrt{\varepsilon_r \mu_r}

For non-magnetic materials (μr1\mu_r \approx 1): nεrn \approx \sqrt{\varepsilon_r}.

The wavelength inside a medium of refractive index nn is λn=λ0/n\lambda_n = \lambda_0/nWhere λ0\lambda_0 Is the vacuum wavelength. The frequency remains unchanged across the boundary.

Worked Example: EM wave propagation in glass

Problem. A plane wave of wavelength λ0=600\lambda_0 = 600 nm in vacuum enters a glass slab (n=1.50n = 1.50) at normal incidence. Find (a) the wavelength and wave speed inside the glass, (b) the Frequency, and (c) the ratio of intensities inside and outside the glass, accounting for reflection At the front surface.

Solution.

(a) λn=λ0/n=600/1.50=400\lambda_n = \lambda_0/n = 600/1.50 = 400 nm. v=c/n=2.0×108v = c/n = 2.0 \times 10^8 m/s.

(b) f=c/λ0=(3×108)/(600×109)=5.0×1014f = c/\lambda_0 = (3 \times 10^8)/(600 \times 10^{-9}) = 5.0 \times 10^{14} Hz (unchanged).

(c) At normal incidence: R=[(n1n2)/(n1+n2)]2=[(11.5)/(1+1.5)]2=(0.5/2.5)2=0.04R = [(n_1 - n_2)/(n_1 + n_2)]^2 = [(1 - 1.5)/(1 + 1.5)]^2 = (0.5/2.5)^2 = 0.04. Transmittance: T=1R=0.96T = 1 - R = 0.96. The intensity inside the glass is Iinside=0.96I0I_{\mathrm{inside} = 0.96\,I_0} But the power per unit area Referenced to the vacuum intensity is Iinside=(n2/n1)TI0=1.5×0.96×I0=1.44I0I_{\mathrm{inside} = (n_2/n_1)\,T\,I_0 = 1.5 \times 0.96 \times I_0 = 1.44\,I_0} If we compare the electric field amplitudes squared times the respective impedances.

At a planar interface between two linear, isotropic media, the tangential components of E\mathbf{E} and H\mathbf{H} and the normal components of D\mathbf{D} and B\mathbf{B} are Continuous across the boundary.

Consider a plane wave incident from medium 1 (n1n_1) onto medium 2 (n2n_2), with the interface at z=0z = 0 and the plane of incidence the xzxz-plane.

The phase matching condition requires the phases of all three waves (incident, reflected, Transmitted) to match at z=0z = 0 for all xx and tt. This gives:

k1sinθi=k1sinθr=k2sinθtk_1\sin\theta_i = k_1\sin\theta_r = k_2\sin\theta_t

From the first equality: θi=θr\theta_i = \theta_r (law of reflection). From the second equality: n1sinθi=n2sinθtn_1\sin\theta_i = n_2\sin\theta_t (Snell’s law).

Proof. The incident, reflected, and transmitted fields are:

Eiei(k1xx+k1zzωt),Erei(k1xx+k1zzωt),Etei(k2xx+k2zzωt)E_i \propto e^{i(k_{1x}x + k_{1z}z - \omega t)}, \quad E_r \propto e^{i(k_{1x}'x + k_{1z}'z - \omega t)}, \quad E_t \propto e^{i(k_{2x}x + k_{2z}z - \omega t)}

At z=0z = 0The tangential field must be continuous for all xx and tt: k1x=k1x=k2xk_{1x} = k_{1x}' = k_{2x}I.e., k1sinθi=k1sinθr=k2sinθtk_1\sin\theta_i = k_1\sin\theta_r = k_2\sin\theta_t. Since k=nω/ck = n\omega/cThis yields Snell’s law. \blacksquare

Applying the boundary conditions for the tangential fields yields the Fresnel equations for the Amplitude reflection and transmission coefficients.

s-polarisation (E\mathbf{E} perpendicular to the plane of incidence, along y^\hat{\mathbf{y}}): The tangential components of E\mathbf{E} and H\mathbf{H} give:

rs=E0rE0i=n1cosθin2cosθtn1cosθi+n2cosθtr_s = \frac{E_{0r}}{E_{0i}} = \frac{n_1\cos\theta_i - n_2\cos\theta_t}{n_1\cos\theta_i + n_2\cos\theta_t}

ts=E0tE0i=2n1cosθin1cosθi+n2cosθtt_s = \frac{E_{0t}}{E_{0i}} = \frac{2n_1\cos\theta_i}{n_1\cos\theta_i + n_2\cos\theta_t}

p-polarisation (E\mathbf{E} parallel to the plane of incidence): The tangential components of E\mathbf{E} and H\mathbf{H} give:

rp=E0rE0i=n2cosθin1cosθtn2cosθi+n1cosθtr_p = \frac{E_{0r}}{E_{0i}} = \frac{n_2\cos\theta_i - n_1\cos\theta_t}{n_2\cos\theta_i + n_1\cos\theta_t}

tp=E0tE0i=2n1cosθin2cosθi+n1cosθtt_p = \frac{E_{0t}}{E_{0i}} = \frac{2n_1\cos\theta_i}{n_2\cos\theta_i + n_1\cos\theta_t}

Reflectance and transmittance (energy fractions):

Rs=rs2,Ts=n2cosθtn1cosθits2,Rs+Ts=1R_s = |r_s|^2, \quad T_s = \frac{n_2\cos\theta_t}{n_1\cos\theta_i}|t_s|^2, \quad R_s + T_s = 1

Rp=rp2,Tp=n2cosθtn1cosθitp2,Rp+Tp=1R_p = |r_p|^2, \quad T_p = \frac{n_2\cos\theta_t}{n_1\cos\theta_i}|t_p|^2, \quad R_p + T_p = 1

At normal incidence (θi=0\theta_i = 0): rs=rp=(n1n2)/(n1+n2)r_s = r_p = (n_1 - n_2)/(n_1 + n_2) and R=[(n1n2)/(n1+n2)]2R = [(n_1 - n_2)/(n_1 + n_2)]^2.

Worked Example: Fresnel coefficients at a glass-air interface

Problem. Light is incident from air (n1=1.00n_1 = 1.00) onto glass (n2=1.50n_2 = 1.50) at θi=30°\theta_i = 30°. Calculate rsr_s, rpr_p, RsR_s And RpR_p.

Solution. From Snell’s law: sinθt=sin30°/1.50=0.333\sin\theta_t = \sin 30°/1.50 = 0.333 So θt=19.47°\theta_t = 19.47°. cosθi=cos30°=0.866\cos\theta_i = \cos 30° = 0.866, cosθt=cos19.47°=0.943\cos\theta_t = \cos 19.47° = 0.943.

rs=1.00×0.8661.50×0.9431.00×0.866+1.50×0.943=0.8661.4140.866+1.414=0.5492.280=0.241r_s = \frac{1.00 \times 0.866 - 1.50 \times 0.943}{1.00 \times 0.866 + 1.50 \times 0.943} = \frac{0.866 - 1.414}{0.866 + 1.414} = \frac{-0.549}{2.280} = -0.241

Rs=rs2=0.0580R_s = r_s^2 = 0.0580

rp=1.50×0.8661.00×0.9431.50×0.866+1.00×0.943=1.2990.9431.299+0.943=0.3562.242=0.159r_p = \frac{1.50 \times 0.866 - 1.00 \times 0.943}{1.50 \times 0.866 + 1.00 \times 0.943} = \frac{1.299 - 0.943}{1.299 + 0.943} = \frac{0.356}{2.242} = 0.159

Rp=rp2=0.0252R_p = r_p^2 = 0.0252

At this angle, p-polarised light is reflected less efficiently than s-polarised light. The Negative sign of rsr_s indicates a phase shift of π\pi upon reflection.

Mistake 1: Forgetting that frequency is conserved when light crosses a boundary When light passes from one medium to another, the frequency remains constant while the wavelength and speed change. Students often mistakenly assume the wavelength is conserved, leading to incorrect calculations of refraction. The correct approach is v=c/nv = c/n, λn=λ0/n\lambda_n = \lambda_0/n, with f=c/λ0f = c/\lambda_0 unchanged across the boundary.

Mistake 2: Confusing amplitude coefficients with energy coefficients in Fresnel equations The Fresnel coefficients rr and tt are amplitude ratios, while R=r2R = |r|^2 and T=(n2cosθt/n1cosθi)t2T = (n_2\cos\theta_t/n_1\cos\theta_i)|t|^2 are energy fractions. Students frequently use R=r2R = r^2 instead of R=r2R = |r|^2 (which matters when rr is negative, indicating a phase shift) and forget the cos factor in the transmittance formula.

Mistake 3: Assuming E=cB|\mathbf{E}| = c|\mathbf{B}| implies E\mathbf{E} and B\mathbf{B} have the same units The relation E=cBE = cB is in SI units, where EE is in V/m and BB is in tesla. The numerical values differ by a factor of c3×108c \approx 3 \times 10^8. In Gaussian units, E=BE = B numerically. Students sometimes forget this distinction when comparing results from different unit systems.