Angular Momentum and the Hydrogen Atom
Recall prompts
Section titled “Recall prompts”Attempt these from memory before reading.
- Write the commutation relations among , and .
- What are the allowed values of and ?
- What is the magnitude of in the state with quantum number ?
- How many states have a given in hydrogen?
- What does the Bohr model predict for the ground-state angular momentum, and what is it actually?
Check your answers against the text. Prompt 5 is the one that matters most, because the two answers differ and the difference is measurable.
Motivation: the algebra does all the work
Section titled “Motivation: the algebra does all the work”The striking thing about angular momentum in quantum mechanics is not that it is quantised. It is that the quantisation follows from three commutation relations,
and from nothing else. No differential equation is solved, no boundary condition is imposed, and no assumption is made about what is made of. Everything else on this page — the allowed values of , the rather than , the ladder structure, even the possibility of half-integer eigenvalues — is already in those three lines.
That is worth seeing clearly, because it is what makes spin possible. Spin has nothing to do with rotating a body in space, so the derivation via cannot apply to it. But spin satisfies the same three commutation relations, so it inherits the same spectrum. The algebra, not the geometry, is the physics.
Why and not . The ladder operators give
and the second term is a positive operator, so . That inequality bounds above and below and forces the top of the ladder to satisfy — and the magnitude comes out , not . The extra is not a correction; it is the statement that you cannot know all three components at once.
The hydrogen atom is the payoff. Separating variables in spherical coordinates turns the angular part into exactly the and eigenvalue problems, and the radial equation into one whose solutions exist only for specific . Three quantum numbers appear because the problem has three compatible symmetries, and the energy depends only on — which is why there are degeneracies to break.
6.1 Angular Momentum Operators
Section titled “6.1 Angular Momentum Operators”Commutation relations:
Simultaneous eigenstates: with
Where and .
6.2 Raising and Lowering Operators
Section titled “6.2 Raising and Lowering Operators”Define the ladder operators:
Key commutation relations:
Proof.
Wait, let us redo this carefully:
Similarly, . And:
Since commutes with each component.
Action on eigenstates. Since :
So is an eigenstate of with eigenvalue : it raises by 1. Similarly, lowers by 1. Both preserve the value since .
Normalisation. Write . Then:
Using :
Therefore:
6.3 Eigenvalue Spectrum of Angular Momentum
Section titled “6.3 Eigenvalue Spectrum of Angular Momentum”Theorem 6.1. The quantum numbers and satisfy:
- (integer or half-integer)
- For a given : (there are values)
- For orbital angular momentum, is restricted to non-negative integers.
Proof. Starting from a state Repeatedly applying raises by 1 each time. The norm of the resulting state is:
This must remain non-negative, so Giving . The raising process must Terminate at some maximum where :
Similarly, the lowering process terminates at where :
Subtracting: . Since we reach from in steps: . Solving gives and So Meaning must be a non-negative integer. Therefore and takes values from to .
For orbital angular momentum (defined as ), The wave function must be single-valued under a full rotation . This requires So must be an integer, which restricts to integers.
6.4 Spherical Harmonics
Section titled “6.4 Spherical Harmonics”The simultaneous eigenfunctions of and are the spherical harmonics :
Where are the associated Legendre functions.
Properties:
- Orthonormality: \int Y_l^m^*\, Y_{l"}^{m'}\,d\Omega = \delta_{ll'}\delta_{mm'}
- Completeness: \sum_{l=0}^{\infty}\sum_{m=-l}^{l} Y_l^m(\theta,\phi)\,Y_l^m^*(\theta',\phi') = \delta(\cos\theta - \cos\theta')\delta(\phi - \phi')
- Parity:
First few spherical harmonics:
6.5 The Hydrogen Atom
Section titled “6.5 The Hydrogen Atom”The Hamiltonian for hydrogen (electron of mass and charge Proton of charge ):
6.5.1 Separation of Variables
Section titled “6.5.1 Separation of Variables”In spherical coordinates, the Laplacian separates, and we write . The radial equation is:
The term acts as an effective centrifugal barrier.
6.5.2 Solving the Radial Equation
Section titled “6.5.2 Solving the Radial Equation”Substitute and define the Bohr radius and the Rydberg energy . With the substitution The radial equation becomes:
For the solution to be well-behaved at both and We require:
With and .
The radial wave functions are:
Where are the associated Laguerre polynomials.
Energy eigenvalues:
E_n = -\frac{m_e e^4}{2(4\pi\varepsilon_0)^2 \hbar^2} \cdot \frac{1}{n^2} = -\frac{13.6\,\mathrm{eV}{n^2}, \quad n = 1, 2, 3, \ldots}Degeneracy: Each energy level has degeneracy (ignoring spin). The quantum numbers are:
- Principal:
- Orbital angular momentum:
- Magnetic:
The ground state wave function ():
Where is the Bohr radius.
6.5.3 Expectation Values for the Ground State
Section titled “6.5.3 Expectation Values for the Ground State”Example 6.1. Calculate , And for the Hydrogen ground state.
Solution
For All integrals involve radial integrals with :
Note that (by the virial theorem). The standard deviation is .
6.5.4 Selection Rules
Section titled “6.5.4 Selection Rules”Electric dipole transitions between hydrogen states are governed by selection rules derived from the Wigner-Eckart theorem. For a transition induced by the electric Dipole operator :
is unrestricted (energy conservation determines which transitions are allowed).
Proof sketch. The matrix element involves the integral . Using the addition theorem for spherical harmonics, The integral becomes a product of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients that vanishes unless and .
6.6 Orbital Shapes and Quantum Numbers
Section titled “6.6 Orbital Shapes and Quantum Numbers”The three quantum numbers characterise hydrogen atom eigenstates:
- (principal): Determines the energy and overall size. The mean radius scales as .
- (orbital angular momentum): Determines the shape. The spectroscopic notation is (s), (p), (d), (f), etc.
- (magnetic): Determines the spatial orientation. The angular dependence is .
Radial probability distribution. The probability of finding the electron between and is . For the state, the maximum is at (the Bohr radius). For There is a node at . For The distribution peaks closer to the nucleus.
Angular distributions. The orbitals () are spherically symmetric. The orbitals () have dumbbell shapes aligned along the -, -, or -axis depending on . The Orbitals () have more complex cloverleaf patterns.
Radial nodes. The radial wave function has nodes (zeros excluding And ). The total number of nodes in the full wave function is Consistent with The general property that the -th energy eigenstate has nodes.
Fine structure. The non-relativistic Schrodinger equation gives energy levels depending only on . Relativistic corrections (spin-orbit coupling, Darwin term, kinetic energy correction) split these Into fine structure multiplets, removing the -degeneracy. The fine structure shift is of order where is the fine structure constant.
Intuition
Section titled “Intuition”Angular momentum in quantum mechanics is like a spinning top that can only point in certain discrete directions. The ladder operators are like climbing stairs: you can raise or lower the magnetic quantum number one step at a time, but you cannot stop between steps. The hydrogen atom is nature’s simplest atom and the hydrogen of quantum mechanics: the electron orbits the nucleus not in fixed paths but in probability clouds shaped like dumbbells, clovers, and spheres. The quantum numbers are like an address: n tells you the floor (energy), l tells you the room shape (angular momentum), and m tells you the orientation. The energy depends only on n, which is a hidden symmetry of the Coulomb potential. The selection rules are like dance rules: the electron can only jump between certain states, which is why hydrogen emits only specific colors of light.
Counterexamples worth knowing by name
Section titled “Counterexamples worth knowing by name”| Claim | True? | Counterexample |
|---|---|---|
| The Bohr model gives the right angular momentum | no | it predicts , so the ground state has ; quantum mechanics gives and , and this is measured |
| can equal | no | ; if then and would both be known exactly |
| Orbital angular momentum can be half-integer | no | single-valuedness of the wave function under rotation forces integer ; spin is a different operator and is exempt |
| The hydrogen ground state has | no | , so it is spherically symmetric and is maximal at the origin |
| vanishes at the nucleus | no | it is maximal there; the probability of finding the electron at the origin is the largest of any state |
| determines | no | it only bounds it, ; for both and occur at the same energy |
| Angular momentum is conserved because the state is an eigenstate of | no | conservation is about commuting with ; a state can be an eigenstate and still not be stationary |
| The energy depends on | no | for the Coulomb potential the energy depends only on , which is why there are degeneracies to break |
The first row is the most important and the most under-appreciated. The Bohr model is usually presented as “right but incomplete”, and for the energy levels that is fair. For angular momentum it is simply wrong: it predicts a ground state that does not exist, and the discrepancy is the first sign that a planar orbit is not what an electron does.
The last row is the one with the most physics behind it. The Coulomb degeneracy is an accidental symmetry — it is higher than the spherical symmetry would suggest — and it is precisely that accident which makes the hydrogen spectrum clean enough to be the standard first example.
Where the research frontier is
Section titled “Where the research frontier is”- Breaking the degeneracy. The Lamb shift, from vacuum fluctuations, splits from and was the first evidence for QED. Measuring it to high precision is still the standard test of bound-state QED.
- The proton radius puzzle. Muonic hydrogen gives a proton radius about 4% smaller than electronic hydrogen does, and resolving whether that is new physics or a systematic took a decade of work.
- Rydberg atoms. Large- hydrogen-like atoms have enormous dipoles and long lifetimes, and are now used as qubits and as electric-field sensors.
- Angular momentum coupling. Real atoms have many electrons, and the coupling schemes ( and ) and their term symbols are where the algebra above earns its keep.
- Exotic “hydrogen” atoms. Positronium, muonium and antiprotonic atoms reuse the hydrogen solution with different masses, testing QED and CPT in ways ordinary hydrogen cannot.
Interleaving problems
Section titled “Interleaving problems”Mix these with the postulates, operators, one-dimensional problems, Symplectic Structure and KAM Theory, Linear Algebra and Hamiltonian Mechanics.
- (Operators.) Compute from using only . Then explain why the result holds for spin even though spin has no or .
- (Linear algebra.) From the commutation relations alone, construct the ladder operators and prove that is restricted to integer or half-integer values. Identify the single step that forces the quantisation, and say what would happen if that step were unavailable.
- (Wave functions.) Show that satisfies the time-independent Schrodinger equation with , by direct substitution. Then compute and confirm it is , not .
- (Classical mechanics.) The Kepler problem is classically integrable and has an extra conserved quantity, the Runge-Lenz vector. Show that its quantum counterpart is what produces the accidental degeneracy between different at the same .
- (Hamiltonian mechanics.) Compare the classical eccentricity of a Kepler orbit with the quantum numbers and , and show that large with reproduces circular orbits. What does large with small correspond to classically?
- (Research.) The proton radius puzzle: muonic hydrogen spectroscopy gives against from electronic hydrogen. State what would have to be true for both to be right, and why the resolution matters more than the number.
Cross-References
Section titled “Cross-References”Operators and Observables: Operators represent physical observables and their commutation relations determine the structure of angular momentum.
Spin: Spin is an intrinsic angular momentum that extends the orbital angular momentum formalism.
Scattering Theory: Scattering theory applies angular momentum techniques to analyze particle collisions.
6.7 Common Mistakes
Section titled “6.7 Common Mistakes”Mistake 1: Confusing the orbital quantum number with the magnetic quantum number For a given , the magnetic quantum number ranges from to in integer steps, giving values. Students sometimes confuse these and assign values outside this range. The quantum number determines the total angular momentum magnitude , while determines the -component .
Mistake 2: Assuming can equal The -component of angular momentum satisfies . The magnitude of is always greater than the magnitude of any single component. This is a consequence of the uncertainty relations between , , and : they cannot all be simultaneously determined.
Mistake 3: Forgetting that is restricted to integers for orbital angular momentum For orbital angular momentum (defined as ), must be a non-negative integer because the wave function must be single-valued under a full rotation. Half-integer values are allowed for spin angular momentum but not for orbital angular momentum. Never assign to an orbital state.