For a Hamiltonian H^=H^0+λH^" where H^′ is “small” and H^0 Has known eigenstates ∣n(0)⟩ and eigenvalues En(0).
First-order energy correction:
En(1)=⟨n(0)∣H^′∣n(0)⟩
Second-order energy correction:
En(2)=∑m=nEn(0)−Em(0)∣⟨m(0)∣H^′∣n(0)⟩∣2
First-order state correction:
∣n(1)⟩=∑m=nEn(0)−Em(0)⟨m(0)∣H^′∣n(0)⟩∣m(0)⟩
Physical interpretation. The first-order energy correction is the expectation value of the Perturbation in the unperturbed state. The second-order correction accounts for virtual transitions To other states: if the perturbation mixes in state ∣m⟩ with amplitude proportional to Vmn/(En−Em)The energy shift is the sum of ∣Vmn∣2/(En−Em) over all Intermediate states. Lower-energy intermediate states (Em<En) always lower the energy, While higher-energy ones raise it.
Higher-order corrections. The perturbation series can be extended to arbitrary order:
En=En(0)+λEn(1)+λ2En(2)+λ3En(3)+⋯
∣n⟩=∣n(0)⟩+λ∣n(1)⟩+λ2∣n(2)⟩+⋯
The series converges if λ∣⟨m∣H^′∣n⟩∣≪∣En(0)−Em(0)∣ for all m=n. In practice, low-order corrections often give excellent results for weak perturbations.
When En(0) is degenerate, the corrections are found by diagonalising the perturbation matrix in The degenerate subspace.
Theorem 8.1. The correct zeroth-order states are the eigenvectors of the matrix Wij=⟨ni(0)∣H^′∣nj(0)⟩ within the degenerate subspace.
Proof. In a d-dimensional degenerate subspace spanned by ∣n1(0)⟩,…,∣nd(0)⟩ The first-order correction to the states is undetermined by the non-degenerate formula (denominators Vanish). The correct approach is to note that H^ restricted to this subspace is:
H^sub=En(0)I^+λW^
Where Wij=⟨ni(0)∣H^′∣nj(0)⟩. Diagonalising W^ gives the correct Zeroth-order states and first-order energy splittings. ■
8.3 Worked Example: Perturbed Infinite Square Well
Problem. A one-dimensional infinite square well of width L has a small perturbation H′=V0 for 0<x<L/2 and H′=0 for L/2<x<L. Find the first-order energy Corrections.
Solution
The unperturbed states are ϕn(0)(x)=2/Lsin(nπx/L).
Using perturbation theory when the perturbation is not small: Perturbation theory assumes V′≪En−Em. If the perturbation is comparable to energy spacings, the series diverges and the results are meaningless. Check the validity condition before applying.
Forgetting that the variational method gives an upper bound, not the exact energy: The variational principle states E0≤⟨ψ∣H∣ψ⟩ for any trial state. A lower trial energy is always better, but you never know how close you are to the true ground state energy.
Neglecting degenerate perturbation theory when eigenvalues are degenerate: Non-degenerate perturbation theory gives infinite corrections when two unperturbed states have the same energy. You must diagonalise the perturbation matrix in the degenerate subspace first.
Applying WKB near classical turning points: The WKB approximation breaks down where p(x)=0 (turning points) because the semiclassical wavefunction diverges. Use connection formulas to match WKB solutions across turning points.