Skip to content

Many-Body Physics in Solids - Wyatt's Notes

14.1 Electron—Electron Interactions: Screening

Section titled “14.1 Electron—Electron Interactions: Screening”

In a metal, the Coulomb interaction between electrons is screened by the other electrons. The Thomas—Fermi screening wavevector:

qTF2=e2g(εF)ε0=4kFπa0q_{\text{TF}^2 = \frac{e^2 g(\varepsilon_F)}{\varepsilon_0} = \frac{4k_F}{\pi a_0}}

Where a0=4πε02/(mee2)a_0 = 4\pi\varepsilon_0\hbar^2/(m_e e^2) is the Bohr radius. The screened potential:

Vscr(r)=e24πε0reqTFrV_{\text{scr}(r) = \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r}\,e^{-q_{\text{TF} r}}}

The screening length λTF=1/qTF0.5\lambda_{\text{TF} = 1/q_{\text{TF} \sim 0.5}} Å in metals (about one atomic spacing), meaning the Coulomb interaction is very short-ranged.

The Hubbard model captures the competition between kinetic energy (delocalisation) and on-site Coulomb repulsion (localisation):

H^=ti,j,σc^iσc^jσ+Uin^in^i\hat{H} = -t\sum_{\langle i,j\rangle,\sigma}\hat{c}_{i\sigma}^\dagger\hat{c}_{j\sigma} + U\sum_i \hat{n}_{i\uparrow}\hat{n}_{i\downarrow}

Where tt is the hopping integral and UU is the on-site repulsion energy.

Limiting cases:

  • UtU \ll t: Weakly correlated metal (well-described by band theory)
  • UtU \gg t: Mott insulator (each site has exactly one electron, localised by strong repulsion)
  • U/t1U/t \sim 1: Strongly correlated regime (intermediate coupling), relevant for transition metal oxides

The half-filled Hubbard model on a bipartite lattice has a metal—insulator transition at UcWU_c \sim W (bandwidth). For U>UcU > U_cThe system is a Mott insulator even though band theory predicts a metal.

14.3 Quasiparticles and Fermi Liquid Theory

Section titled “14.3 Quasiparticles and Fermi Liquid Theory”

Landau”s Fermi liquid theory (1956) states that the low-energy excitations of an interacting Fermi system can be described as quasiparticles --- weakly interacting fermions with renormalised parameters:

  • Effective mass mm^* (renormalised by interactions)
  • Residual quasiparticle—quasiparticle interactions described by Landau parameters FlF_l

The quasiparticle lifetime goes as τ1/(εεF)2\tau \propto 1/(\varepsilon - \varepsilon_F)^2 So quasiparticles near the Fermi surface are well-defined (long-lived).

Experimental signatures of Fermi liquid behaviour:

  • CV=γTC_V = \gamma T with enhanced γm\gamma \propto m^*
  • ρ=ρ0+AT2\rho = \rho_0 + AT^2 (quadratic temperature dependence)
  • Pauli-like susceptibility χ\chi (temperature-independent)

Non-Fermi liquid behaviour occurs in many correlated systems (cuprates near optimal doping, heavy fermion materials near quantum critical points) where ρT\rho \propto T (linear) or other anomalous power laws are observed.

When a magnetic impurity (e.g., a single Fe atom) is embedded in a non-magnetic metal, the impurity spin is screened by conduction electrons at low temperature, forming a singlet state. This is the Kondo effect.

The Kondo temperature TKT_K sets the energy scale:

kBTKDe1/(N(EF)J)k_B T_K \sim D\,e^{-1/(N(E_F)J)}

Where DD is the bandwidth and JJ is the exchange coupling. Below TKT_K:

  • The resistivity increases logarithmically: Δρln(TK/T)\Delta\rho \propto \ln(T_K/T)
  • The impurity moment is fully screened
  • A narrow resonance (Kondo resonance) appears at the Fermi level in the density of states
Worked Example 14.1: Mott Transition

Consider the Hubbard model at half-filling on a Bethe lattice (infinite coordination number) with bandwidth W=12tW = 12t.

The Mott transition occurs when UWU \sim W. For typical transition metal oxides:

  • VO2_2: U1U \sim 122 eV, W2W \sim 2 eV --- near the transition (VO2_2 undergoes a metal—insulator transition at Tc=340T_c = 340 K)
  • NiO: U5U \sim 588 eV, W2W \sim 2 eV --- deep in the insulating regime
  • SrVO3_3: U1U \sim 133 eV, W3W \sim 3 eV --- correlated metal

In the Mott insulator NiO, band theory predicts a partially filled 3d3d band (metal), but strong correlations open a gap of 4\sim 4 eV between the lower and upper Hubbard bands. This is why DFT (which underestimates correlations) incorrectly predicts NiO to be metallic, while DFT+UU or GW methods correctly give an insulator.

Worked Example 14.2: Effective Mass Enhancement

In a heavy fermion material like CeCu2_2Si2_2The electronic specific heat coefficient is γ1\gamma \approx 1 J/(mol\cdotK2^2), compared with the free electron value γ01\gamma_0 \approx 1 mJ/(mol\cdotK2^2).

The mass enhancement:

mme=γγ010001=1000\frac{m^*}{m_e} = \frac{\gamma}{\gamma_0} \approx \frac{1000}{1} = 1000

This enormous enhancement arises from the Kondo effect: the 4f4f electrons of Ce hybridise with conduction electrons, forming heavy quasiparticles. The Kondo temperature TK10T_K \sim 10 K is the characteristic energy scale.

Similarly, the Pauli susceptibility is enhanced: χ/χ0=m/me=1000\chi/\chi_0 = m^*/m_e = 1000.

QuantityExpressionPhysical Meaning
Thomas-Fermi wavevectorqTF2=e2g(εF)/ε0q_{\text{TF}}^2 = e^2 g(\varepsilon_F)/\varepsilon_0Inverse screening length
Screened potentialVscr(r)=(e2/4πε0r)eqTFrV_{\text{scr}}(r) = (e^2/4\pi\varepsilon_0 r)e^{-q_{\text{TF}} r}Exponentially decaying Coulomb interaction
Kondo temperaturekBTKDe1/(N(EF)J)k_B T_K \sim D\,e^{-1/(N(E_F)J)}Energy scale for impurity spin screening
Fermi liquid lifetimeτ1/(εεF)2\tau \propto 1/(\varepsilon - \varepsilon_F)^2Quasiparticle decay rate near Fermi surface
Mott criterionUcWU_c \sim W (bandwidth)Onset of Mott insulating state
  • Confusing the Thomas-Fermi screening length with the Debye length (the former applies to degenerate electrons, the latter to classical plasmas).
  • Assuming that the Hubbard model U/tU/t parameter fully determines the physics; lattice geometry and filling also matter.
  • Treating quasiparticles as real particles: they are emergent excitations that can decay, and their effective mass can be negative.
  • Neglecting that the Kondo effect requires a magnetic impurity in a non-magnetic host; in a magnetic host the physics is different.
  • Confusing the Mott insulator (driven by electron correlations) with a band insulator (driven by filled bands and a band gap).
flowchart TD
A[14_Many Body Physics In Solids] --> B[Key Concepts]
A --> C[Core Principles]
A --> D[Practical Applications]
B --> E[Fundamental definitions]
C --> F[Design patterns]
D --> G[Real-world usage]

Many-body physics studies how enormous numbers of interacting particles produce emergent phenomena. In a metal, electrons interact via Coulomb forces, but the collective behavior is described by quasiparticles with modified mass and lifetime. The electron gas behaves like a nearly free Fermi liquid, with interactions creating a sea of virtual excitations. Phonons are collective vibrations that behave as particles, mediating interactions between electrons. This framework explains superconductivity, magnetism, and the metal-insulator transition. The key insight is that complex many-body problems can often be mapped to simpler single-particle problems with renormalized parameters.

This section provides detailed coverage of advanced concepts, including full derivations, proofs, and extended examples.

Complete mathematical derivations and proofs are provided where appropriate. Each step is explained to ensure understanding of the underlying reasoning.

Advanced examples demonstrate the application of concepts to complex problems. These examples go beyond standard exam questions to develop deeper understanding.

This material connects to current research and advanced applications in the field. Understanding these connections provides context for the study material.

Ensure you have mastered the prerequisite material before attempting this advanced content.