Big Bang Cosmology
7.1 The Friedmann Equations
Section titled “7.1 The Friedmann Equations”The dynamics of a homogeneous, isotropic universe are described by the Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric:
ds^2 = -c^2 dt^2 + a(t)^2\left[\frac{dr^2}{1 - kr^2} + r^2(d\theta^2 + \sin^2\theta,d\phi^2)\right]
Where is the scale factor and is the curvature parameter.
The Friedmann equation (from Einstein’s equations with the FLRW metric):
H^2 = \left(\frac{\dot{a}}{a}\right)^2 = \frac{8\pi G}{3}\rho - \frac{kc^2}{a^2} + \frac{\Lambda c^2}{3}
Where is the Hubble parameter and is the cosmological constant.
Derivation of the Friedmann equation. Starting from the Einstein field equations:
G_{\mu\nu} + \Lambda g_{\mu\nu} = \frac{8\pi G}{c^4}T_{\mu\nu}
The FLRW metric gives the Einstein tensor components and . For a perfect fluid with The component yields:
\frac{3(\dot{a}^2 + kc^2)}{c^2 a^2} + \Lambda = \frac{8\pi G}{c^4}\rho c^2
Multiplying through by :
\dot{a}^2 + kc^2 = \frac{8\pi G}{3}\rho a^2 + \frac{\Lambda c^2 a^2}{3}
Dividing by :
H^2 = \frac{8\pi G}{3}\rho - \frac{kc^2}{a^2} + \frac{\Lambda c^2}{3} \quad \blacksquare
The acceleration equation:
\frac{\ddot{a}}{a} = -\frac{4\pi G}{3}\left(\rho + \frac{3P}{c^2}\right) + \frac{\Lambda c^2}{3}
The fluid equation (from energy conservation):
\dot{\rho} + 3\frac{\dot{a}}{a}\left(\rho + \frac{P}{c^2}\right) = 0
7.2 Critical Density and Cosmological Parameters
Section titled “7.2 Critical Density and Cosmological Parameters”The critical density: kg/m.
The density parameters: With for a flat universe.
Current best-fit values (Planck 2018):
- (matter: baryonic + dark)
- (baryonic matter)
- (dark matter)
- (dark energy)
- (radiation)
- km/s/Mpc
The universe is very close to flat ().
7.3 Solutions for Different Components
Section titled “7.3 Solutions for Different Components”For an equation of state :
\rho \propto a^{-3(1+w)}
| Component | ||
|---|---|---|
| Matter | ||
| Radiation | ||
| Dark energy (cosmological constant) | constant |
Derivation. From the fluid equation with :
\dot{\rho} + 3\frac{\dot{a}}{a}\rho(1 + w) = 0
\frac{\dot{\rho}}{\rho} = -3(1+w)\frac{\dot{a}}{a}
Integrating: Giving .
- Matter-dominated era: , .
- Radiation-dominated era: , .
- Dark-energy-dominated era: (exponential expansion).
Example 7.1: Scale factor evolution in a matter-dominated universe
For a flat (), matter-dominated () universe with The Friedmann equation becomes:
\left(\frac{\dot{a}}{a}\right)^2 = \frac{8\pi G}{3}\rho_0\left(\frac{a_0}{a}\right)^3
Where is the density at . Setting :
\dot{a}^2 = \frac{8\pi G\rho_0}{3},a^{-1}
\dot{a} = \sqrt{\frac{8\pi G\rho_0}{3}},a^{-1/2}
Integrating:
\frac{2}{3}a^{3/2} = \sqrt{\frac{8\pi G\rho_0}{3}},t
a(t) = \left(\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{\frac{8\pi G\rho_0}{3}}\right)^{2/3} t^{2/3}
a(t) \propto t^{2/3} \quad \blacksquare
The Hubble parameter: So the age of a matter-dominated Universe is . For km/s/Mpc, this gives Gyr, which is less than the age of the oldest stars --- this Inconsistency was one of the motivations for introducing dark energy.
7.4 The Cosmic Microwave Background
Section titled “7.4 The Cosmic Microwave Background”At K (, years), the universe cooled enough for electrons And protons to combine into neutral hydrogen (recombination). Before this, photons were Continuously scattered by free electrons (the universe was opaque). After recombination, photons Decoupled and travelled freely.
These photons have been redshifted by the expansion of the universe and are observed today as the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) at K, with a peak wavelength mm (microwave).
Temperature-redshift relation. The CMB temperature at redshift is:
T(z) = T_0(1 + z)
This follows from the adiabatic expansion of a photon gas: and So .
7.5 CMB Anisotropy
Section titled “7.5 CMB Anisotropy”The CMB is nearly isotropic but has small temperature fluctuations: .
The angular power spectrum of these fluctuations encodes cosmological parameters:
- The first peak at confirms the universe is spatially flat.
- The relative heights of peaks determine the baryon density .
- The damping tail constrains the matter density and Hubble constant.
The CMB is also polarised at the level of . Two modes:
- E-mode: Gradient-type polarisation, produced by density fluctuations (scalar perturbations).
- B-mode: Curl-type polarisation, produced by gravitational waves (tensor perturbations).
Detection of primordial B-mode polarisation would provide evidence for inflation.
Example 7.5: CMB temperature at recombination
The CMB temperature today is K. At recombination ():
T_{\mathrm{rec} = T_0(1 + z_{\mathrm{rec}) = 2.725 \times 1101 \approx 3000;\mathrm{K}}}
The peak wavelength of the CMB blackbody spectrum today is:
\lambda_{\mathrm{peak} = \frac{b}{T_0} = \frac{2.898 \times 10^{-3};\mathrm{m}\cdot K}{2.725;\mathrm{K} \approx 1.06;\mathrm{mm}}}
Where is Wien’s displacement constant. At recombination:
\lambda_{\mathrm{peak}^{\mathrm{rec} = \frac{b}{T_{\mathrm{rec}} = \frac{2.898 \times 10^{-3}}{3000} \approx 966;\mathrm{nm}}}}
This is in the near-infrared range. The photons have been redshifted by a factor of from near-infrared to microwave wavelengths over 13.8 billion years.
7.6 Big Bang Nucleosynthesis
Section titled “7.6 Big Bang Nucleosynthesis”In the first few minutes after the Big Bang, the universe was hot and dense enough for nuclear Reactions to occur. The main products were:
| Nucleus | Mass fraction |
|---|---|
| H | |
| He | |
| D, He | |
| Li |
The nuclear reaction chain starts at MeV ( s):
p + n \to d + \gamma
d + p \to {^3\mathrm{He} + \gamma, \quad d + d \to {^3\mathrm{He} + n, \quad d + d \to t + p}}
t + d \to {^4\mathrm{He} + \gamma, \quad {^3\mathrm{He} + d \to {^4\mathrm{He} + p}}}
The process stops at He because there are no stable nuclei with .
At MeV, weak interactions maintain in thermal equilibrium:
\frac{n}{p} = e^{-\Delta m c^2/(k_B T)}
Where MeV/.
When MeV ( s), the weak interaction rate falls below the expansion rate (), and the ratio freezes out at . By the time Nucleosynthesis begins ( s), neutron decay has reduced this to .
The predicted helium mass fraction:
Y_p = \frac{2(n/p)}{1 + n/p} \approx 0.25
Derivation of the helium mass fraction
Let and be the number densities of neutrons and protons. The neutron-to-proton Ratio at freeze-out is:
\frac{n_n}{n_p} = \frac{1}{7}
Almost all neutrons end up in He nuclei. Each He nucleus contains 2 neutrons and 2 protons, so the number of He nuclei per unit volume is:
n_{^4\mathrm{He} = \frac{n_n}{2}}
The remaining protons stay as hydrogen: $$ n_H = n_p - 2n_{^4\mathrm{He}} = n_p - n_n
The baryon number density is $n_b = n_n + n_p$. The helium mass fraction is:Y_p = \frac{4 n_{^4\mathrm{He}}}{n_b} = \frac{4 (n_n/2)}{n_n + n_p} = \frac{2n_n}{n_n + n_p} = \frac{2(n_n/n_p)}{1 + n_n/n_p}
Substituting $n_n/n_p = 1/7$:Y_p = \frac{2/7}{1 + 1/7} = \frac{2/7}{8/7} = \frac{2}{8} = 0.25 \quad \blacksquare
This prediction is remarkably robust and agrees with the observed primordial helium Abundance $Y_p^{\mathrm{obs} \approx 0.245 \pm 0.003}$ to within a few percent. The small Discrepancy is accounted for by including the precise neutron lifetime, detailed Reaction network, and non-thermal effects. </details> BBN predictions agree with observations of primordial abundances. The deuterium abundance is Particularly sensitive to the baryon-to-photon ratio $\eta = n_b/n_\gamma$: \eta \approx 6.1 \times 10^{-10} This value is consistent with that derived from the CMB, providing strong support for the Big Bang Model. <details> <summary>Example 7.2: BBN as a probe of the baryon density</summary> The primordial deuterium abundance depends sensitively on the baryon-to-photon ratio $\eta$. For $\eta \approx 6.1 \times 10^{-10}$: \mathrm{D}/H \approx 2.5 \times 10^{-5} If the baryon density were significantly higher ($\eta \sim 10^{-9}$), deuterium would Be much more efficiently processed into $^4$ He, and the deuterium abundance would drop by Orders of magnitude. Conversely, a lower baryon density would leave more deuterium unburned. This strong dependence makes deuterium the best "baryometer" from BBN. Observations of Deuterium absorption in high-redshift quasar spectra give: \mathrm{D}/H = (2.527 \pm 0.030) \times 10^{-5} This constrains $\eta = (6.10 \pm 0.04) \times 10^{-10}$ In excellent agreement with The CMB value of $\eta = (6.13 \pm 0.04) \times 10^{-10}$. The concordance between two Completely independent measurements (one from nuclear physics at $t \sim 3$ min, the other From CMB physics at $t \sim 380\,000$ yr) is one of the strongest tests of the Big Bang Model. </details> ### 7.7 Dark Matter **Evidence for dark matter:** 1. **Galaxy rotation curves:** Stars orbit as if there is much more mass than is visible. The velocity does not decrease with distance from the galactic centre (as expected from Keplerian orbits), indicating a dark matter halo. 2. **Galaxy clusters:** The virial theorem gives masses much larger than the luminous mass (Zwicky, 1933). 3. **Gravitational lensing:** The deflection of light by galaxy clusters indicates more mass than visible matter. 4. **CMB anisotropy:** The angular power spectrum requires $\Omega_{\mathrm{DM} \approx 0.266}$. 5. **Large-scale structure:** N-body simulations reproduce the observed cosmic web only with dark matter. **Properties:** - Does not emit, absorb, or scatter light (non-luminous). - Is **cold** (non-relativistic at structure formation): CDM model. - Accounts for $\sim 27\%$ of the total energy density. - Interacts primarily via gravity (and possibly the weak force). **Candidates:** - **WIMPs** (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles): $m \sim 10$ GeV--1 TeV. Predicted by supersymmetry. Searched for in direct detection experiments (XENON, LUX) and at the LHC. No confirmed detection. - **Axions:** Light particles ($m \sim 10^{-5}$ eV/$c^2$) proposed to solve the strong CP problem. - **Sterile neutrinos:** Right-handed neutrinos that do not participate in weak interactions. - **Primordial black holes:** Black holes formed in the early universe. <details> <summary>Example 7.4: Galaxy rotation curve and dark matter halo</summary> Consider a spiral galaxy with a flat rotation curve: $v(r) = v_0 \approx 200$ km/s For $r \gt r_0$ (where $r_0$ is the core radius). **Without dark matter:** For a galaxy with luminous mass $M_{\mathrm{lum}}$ concentrated Within $r_0$ Keplerian dynamics gives: v(r) = \sqrt{\frac{GM_{\mathrm{lum}}{r}}} This predicts $v \propto r^{-1/2}$ at large $r$ In conflict with the observed flat Rotation curve. **With a dark matter halo:** Assume a singular isothermal sphere profile with density: \rho(r) = \frac{v_0^2}{4\pi G r^2} The enclosed mass is: M(r) = \int_0^r 4\pi r'^2 \rho(r')\,dr' = \int_0^r \frac{v_0^2}{G}\,dr' = \frac{v_0^2 r}{G} The circular velocity is: v(r) = \sqrt{\frac{GM(r)}{r}} = \sqrt{\frac{G \cdot v_0^2 r/G}{r}} = v_0 The velocity is constant, matching the flat rotation curve. The total mass within radius $r$ is $M(r) = v_0^2 r / G$. **Numerical example.** For $v_0 = 200$ km/s and $r = 50$ kpc: M(50\;\mathrm{kpc}) = \frac{(200 \times 10^3\;\mathrm{m}/s)^2 \times 50 \times 3.086 \times 10^{19}\;\mathrm{m}{6.674 \times 10^{-11}\;\mathrm{m}^3\,kg^{-1}\,s^{-2}}} = \frac{4 \times 10^{10} \times 1.543 \times 10^{21}}{6.674 \times 10^{-11}} = \frac{6.17 \times 10^{31}}{6.674 \times 10^{-11}} \approx 9.25 \times 10^{41}\;\mathrm{kg} This is roughly $4.6 \times 10^{11}$ solar masses, far exceeding the visible mass of a Typical spiral galaxy ($\sim 10^{11}$ solar masses), demonstrating that dark matter Dominates the mass budget. </details> ### 7.8 Dark Energy In 1998, two teams (Riess et al., Perlmutter et al.) observed that Type Ia supernovae are fainter than expected for a decelerating universe. This implies the expansion is **accelerating**: $\ddot{a} \gt 0$. From the acceleration equation, this requires $\rho + 3P/c^2 \lt 0$ Which is satisfied by a Component with $w \lt -1/3$. The simplest explanation is **Einstein's cosmological constant** $\Lambda$ With equation of state $w = -1$: \rho_\Lambda = \frac{\Lambda c^2}{8\pi G}, \quad P_\Lambda = -\rho_\Lambda c^2 **The cosmological constant problem:** Quantum field theory predicts a vacuum energy of order $M_{\mathrm{Pl}^4}$ ($\sim 10^{120}$ times larger than the observed value). The origin of the tiny Observed value is one of the deepest unsolved problems in physics. Alternative models include **quintessence** (a dynamic scalar field with $-1 \lt w \lt -1/3$) And **modified gravity** (e.g., $f(R)$ gravity). Current data are consistent with $w = -1$ (cosmological constant), but precision is limited. <details> <summary>Example 7.3: Acceleration from Type Ia supernovae</summary> Type Ia supernovae are "standardisable candles": their peak luminosity is correlated With the shape of their light curve, allowing intrinsic variations to be calibrated. For a flat universe, the luminosity distance is: d_L = c(1+z)\int_0^z \frac{dz'}{H(z')} Where $H(z) = H_0\sqrt{\Omega_m(1+z)^3 + \Omega_\Lambda}$ for a $\Lambda$ CDM universe. The observed flux is $F = L/(4\pi d_L^2)$. For a matter-only universe ($\Omega_\Lambda = 0$), Supernovae at $z \sim 0.5$ appear brighter (closer) than in a $\Lambda$ CDM universe with $\Omega_\Lambda \approx 0.7$. The key observational result (Riess et al. 1998, Perlmutter et al. 1999) was that the Measured $d_L$ at $z \sim 0.5$ was **larger** than predicted by the matter-only model, Implying the supernovae were fainter. This required $\Omega_\Lambda \gt 0$. The deceleration parameter at $z = 0$ is: q_0 = -\frac{\ddot{a}a}{\dot{a}^2}\bigg\rvert_{t_0} = \frac{\Omega_m}{2} - \Omega_\Lambda For $\Omega_m = 0.3$ and $\Omega_\Lambda = 0.7$: $q_0 = 0.15 - 0.7 = -0.55 \lt 0$ Confirming Acceleration. </details> ### 7.9 Inflation The standard Big Bang model has several unresolved issues: 1. **Horizon problem:** The CMB is uniform across the sky, but regions separated by more than $\sim 1^\circ$ were causally disconnected at recombination. 2. **Flatness problem:** $\Omega$ must have been extraordinarily close to 1 in the early universe: $|\Omega - 1| \lt 10^{-60}$ at $t \sim 10^{-36}$ s. 3. **Monopole problem:** Grand unified theories predict abundant magnetic monopoles, none of which are observed. 4. **Origin of structure:** What seeded the density fluctuations that grew into galaxies? <details> <summary>Example 7.6: The flatness problem</summary> Define the deviation from critical density: \lvert\Omega(t) - 1\rvert = \frac{\lvert\rho - \rho_c\rvert}{\rho_c} The Friedmann equation with $k \neq 0$ gives: \rho_c - \rho = \frac{3kc^2}{8\pi G a^2} So $\rho_c - \rho \propto a^{-2}$ While $\rho_c \propto H^2 \propto \rho$ (in a Radiation- or matter-dominated era). Therefore: \lvert\Omega - 1\rvert = \frac{\lvert\rho_c - \rho\rvert}{\rho_c} \propto \frac{a^{-2}}{a^{-3}} = a \quad \mathrm{(matter\mathrm{-dominated)}} \lvert\Omega - 1\rvert \propto \frac{a^{-2}}{a^{-4}} = a^2 \quad \mathrm{(radiation\mathrm{-dominated)}} **In a matter-dominated universe:** $\lvert\Omega - 1\rvert$ grows linearly with $a$. Going From $a_{\mathrm{now} = 1}$ back to the Planck time ($a \sim 10^{-32}$): \lvert\Omega - 1\rvert_{\mathrm{Planck} \sim 10^{-32} \times \lvert\Omega - 1\rvert_{\mathrm{now}}} Since $\lvert\Omega_{\mathrm{now} - 1\rvert \sim 0.007}$ This gives: \lvert\Omega - 1\rvert_{\mathrm{Planck} \sim 7 \times 10^{-35}} This is an extraordinarily fine-tuned initial condition. Inflation solves this by Exponentially expanding $a$ by a factor of $e^{N}$ ($N \sim 60$), driving $\lvert\Omega - 1\rvert$ to $e^{-2N} \sim 10^{-52}$ after inflation, which then Grows to the observed value by the present day. </details> **Inflation** (Guth, 1981) proposes a period of exponential expansion in the early universe: a(t) \propto e^{Ht}, \quad H \approx \mathrm{const} Lasting from $t \sim 10^{-36}$ s to $t \sim 10^{-33}$ s, during which the universe expanded by a Factor of $\sim e^{60} \sim 10^{26}$. **Resolutions:** - **Horizon:** Inflation pushes all pre-existing causal contacts outside the observable horizon, making the CMB uniform. - **Flatness:** Inflation drives $\Omega$ exponentially close to 1, regardless of its initial value. - **Monopoles:** Inflation dilutes their density to negligible levels. - **Structure:** Quantum fluctuations during inflation are stretched to macroscopic scales, providing the primordial perturbation spectrum (nearly scale-invariant, $n_s \approx 0.965$). Inflation is driven by a scalar field $\phi$ (the **inflaton**) with potential $V(\phi)$. The Slow-roll parameters are: \epsilon = \frac{M_{\mathrm{Pl}^2}{2}\left(\frac{V'}{V}\right)^2 \ll 1, \quad \eta = M_{\mathrm{Pl}^2 \frac{V''}{V} \ll 1}} The number of e-folds: $N = \int_{t_i}^{t_f} H\,dt$. The spectral index: $n_s = 1 - 6\epsilon + 2\eta \approx 0.965$ (Planck 2018), consistent with Slow-roll inflation. The tensor-to-scalar ratio: $r = 16\epsilon$. Current upper bound: $r \lt 0.036$ (Planck + BICEP/Keck). ### 7.10 The Hubble Tension The Hubble constant $H_0$ measured from the CMB ($\sim 67.4$ km/s/Mpc, Planck 2018, assuming $\Lambda$ CDM) disagrees with local distance-ladder measurements ($\sim 73.0$ km/s/Mpc, SH0ES). This discrepancy is now at the $\sim 5\sigma$ level and is one of the most significant open problems in cosmology. Possible resolutions include: 1. **Systematic errors** in one or both measurement methods. 2. **New physics** prior to recombination (e.g., additional radiation, early dark energy). 3. **Extensions to $\Lambda$ CDM** (e.g., time-varying dark energy equation of state $w(z)$). :::caution Planck) disagrees with Local distance-ladder measurements ($\sim 73.0$ km/s/Mpc, SH0ES). This "Hubble tension" is one of The most significant open problems in cosmology. When using $H_0$ in calculations, be aware of Which measurement you are referencing and the systematic uncertainties involved. ### 7.11 Timeline of the Universe <div class="table-wrap"> | Time | Temperature | Event | | -------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------- | | $0$ | $\infty$ | Big Bang | | $10^{-43}$ s | $10^{19}$ GeV | Planck epoch (quantum gravity) | | $10^{-36}$ s | $10^{16}$ GeV | Inflation, GUT symmetry breaking | | $10^{-12}$ s | $10^2$ GeV | Electroweak symmetry breaking | | $10^{-6}$ s | $\sim 200$ MeV | QCD phase transition | | 1 s | $\sim 1$ MeV | Neutrino decoupling, $n/p$ freeze-out | | 3 min | $\sim 0.1$ MeV | Big Bang nucleosynthesis | | $380\,000$ yr | 3000 K | Recombination, CMB released | | $\sim 200$ Myr | $\sim 30$ K | First stars (reionisation) | | $\sim 1$ Gyr | $\sim 10$ K | Galaxy formation | | 9.2 Gyr | $\sim 5$ K | Solar system forms | | 13.8 Gyr | 2.725 K | Present day | </div> ::: ## Intuition The Big Bang was not an explosion in space but the expansion of space itself. Every galaxy is receding because the fabric between them stretches, like dots on an inflating balloon moving apart. The Friedmann equation is Newton's second law applied to the universe's expansion: gravity decelerates expansion while dark energy accelerates it. The critical density is the tipping point between eternal expansion and eventual collapse. The Hubble parameter measures how fast space is stretching right now. The universe's geometry depends on whether its density exceeds, equals, or falls below the critical value. ### 7.12 Common Mistakes **Mistake 1: Assuming that the Big Bang was an explosion in space.** The Big Bang was not an explosion from a central point into pre-existing space. It was the rapid expansion of space itself. Every point in the universe was once arbitrarily close to every other point. Do not think of the Big Bang as an explosion in the usual sense. **Mistake 2: Confusing the Hubble parameter with the Hubble constant.** The Hubble parameter $H(t)$ is a function of time, while the Hubble constant $H_0$ is its present-day value. Do not assume that $H$ is constant; it changes with the expansion of the universe. **Mistake 3: Forgetting that the宇宙 is expanding faster than the speed of light.** The expansion of the universe can cause distant galaxies to recede faster than the speed of light. This does not violate special relativity because it is space itself that is expanding, not objects moving through space. Do not assume that the speed of light is an absolute speed limit for recession velocities. **Mistake 4: Confusing the critical density with the actual density.** The critical density $\rho_c = 3H^2/(8\pi G)$ is the density at which the universe is flat. The actual density may be higher or lower than the critical density. Do not assume that the universe has the critical density; the density parameter $\Omega = \rho/\rho_c$ determines the geometry. **Mistake 5: Assuming that the宇宙 has no boundary implies it is infinite.** A universe with no boundary can be finite or infinite. For example, a closed universe (positive curvature) is finite but has no boundary. Do not assume that a boundaryless universe is infinite. ## Cross-References - **[The Standard Model](/7-particle-physics-and-cosmology/1_the-standard-model/)**: Particle physics determines the conditions during Big Bang nucleosynthesis and the electroweak phase transition. - **[Conservation Laws and Symmetries](/7-particle-physics-and-cosmology/2_conservation-laws-and-symmetries/)**: Baryon number conservation and its possible violation are essential for understanding the matter-antimatter asymmetry. - **[Running Coupling Constants](/7-particle-physics-and-cosmology/6_running-coupling-constants/)**: The running of coupling constants affects the physics of the early universe and primordial nucleosynthesis. - **[Advanced Topics in Cosmology](/7-particle-physics-and-cosmology/12_advanced-topics-in-cosmology/)**: Dark matter halos, the Sachs-Wolfe effect, and topological defects extend the basic cosmological framework. - [Calculus](https://mathematics.wyattau.com/docs/calculus) - [Linear Algebra](https://mathematics.wyattau.com/2-linear-algebra/) - [Quantum Computing](https://computer-science.wyattau.com/docs/quantum-computing) ## Related in this track - [Advanced Topics in Cosmology](/7-particle-physics-and-cosmology/12_advanced-topics-in-cosmology/) - [Advanced Topics in Particle Physics](/7-particle-physics-and-cosmology/11_advanced-topics-in-particle-physics/) - [Beyond the Standard Model](/7-particle-physics-and-cosmology/9_beyond-the-standard-model/) - [Conservation Laws and Symmetries](/7-particle-physics-and-cosmology/2_conservation-laws-and-symmetries/)